Request for Review: DI Generation Improvements

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Monday, May 14, 2012 17:36:49 Adam Wilson wrote:
> This can be easily changed. Does anyone see any potential problems with
> making this change?

The only modules in druntime that I am aware of where there would be actual 
problems if their .d files were used instead of .di files would be those which 
already have hand-maintained .di files (core.thread and object are the only two 
that I'm aware of, though there might be others). Beyond that, core.rt 
definitely should be using .di files, but AFAIK, it wouldn't actually hurt 
anything beyond compilation times for them to be .d files, and AFAIK, all of 
the rest of druntime can be .d files without causing any problems. Most of them 
just hold C declarations anyway.

- Jonathan M Davis