arrays: if(null == [ ])

[Gor Gyolchanyan]

UTF manipulation functions are fundamental enough, because all of D's
strings are UTF-something.
I think std.utf deserves to be in druntime.

On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 6:05 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen <xtzgzorex at gmail.com>wrote:

> On 15-05-2012 15:35, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>
>> Even if it's wrong to move writef to druntime, the toUTFz is still a
>> very small word to write.
>>
>> On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
>>
>> <xtzgzorex at gmail.com <mailto:xtzgzorex at gmail.com>> wrote:
>>
>>    On 15-05-2012 15:22, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
>>
>>        On Tue, May 15, 2012 at 4:00 PM, Alex Rønne Petersen
>>        <xtzgzorex at gmail.com <mailto:xtzgzorex at gmail.com>
>>        <mailto:xtzgzorex at gmail.com <mailto:xtzgzorex at gmail.com>>> wrote:
>>
>>
>>            Yes, because using a Phobos function in druntime is perfectly
>>            possible! Totally!
>>              --
>>            - Alex
>>
>>
>>        Isn't it obvious what needs to be done? Come on, it's no too
>>        hard to see...
>>
>>
>>        --
>>        Bye,
>>        Gor Gyolchanyan.
>>
>>
>>    No, it should not be moved to druntime. druntime is the low-level
>>    abstraction layer over the compiler, nothing else.
>>
>>    Further, all the write* functions perform GC allocation, which is
>>    unacceptable in druntime.
>>
>>    --
>>    - Alex
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bye,
>> Gor Gyolchanyan.
>>
>
> It's a Phobos function.
>
> --
> - Alex
>



-- 
Bye,
Gor Gyolchanyan.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20120515/6a2cb277/attachment.html>