D dropped in favour of C# for PSP emulator

[Alex Rønne Petersen]

On 16-05-2012 17:28, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Wed, 16 May 2012 10:47:23 -0400, Tobias Pankrath <panke at tzi.de> wrote:
>
>> Andrei you are against an in-operator for array, because it would
>> provide a uniform interface for arrays and AA with different
>> complexity. Is contains with different complexity for ranges and for
>> SortedRange not the same?
>
> No it's not the same.
>
> It all depends on what the function advertises as its complexity.
>
> It's OK for a function that advertises O(n) complexity to be applied to
> a type that's optimized into O(lgn) complexity.
>
> But it's NOT OK for a function that advertises O(lgn) complexity to be
> applied to a type that requires O(n) complexity.
>
> It all depends on what the existing situation is. Generic code is
> written against the documentation, because it doesn't know what's
> actually going to be implemented underneath.
>
> -Steve

People aren't using 'in' in generic code at all, so I'm not sure this 
comparison makes sense anyway.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex at lycus.org
http://lycus.org