D dropped in favour of C# for PSP emulator

Peter Alexander peter.alexander.au at gmail.com
Fri May 18 14:11:06 PDT 2012


On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 19:19:04 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 5/17/12 11:52 AM, Peter Alexander wrote:
>> On Thursday, 17 May 2012 at 15:26:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
>> wrote:
>>> I agree binarySearch is more precise, but I also think it's a 
>>> minor
>>> issue not worth the cost of changing at this point. Improving 
>>> names of
>>> things in the standard library is a quest that could go 
>>> forever, make
>>> everybody happy we're making progress, and achieve no 
>>> substantial gain.
>>
>> No need to change anything, just add something:
>>
>> bool binarySearch(Range, Value)(Range range, Value value)
>> {
>> return assumeSorted(range).contains(value);
>> }
>>
>> (constraints, predicates and the myriad of 
>> qualifiers/decorations
>> omitted for clarity).
>
> I don't see much benefit in this - just lateral walking. As 
> long as the keyphrase "binary search" is present in the 
> documentation, that's all that's needed as far as newcomers 
> discoverability is concerned.

It's not just for newcomers discoverability, it's also for 
readability. Reading the assumeSorted version, it's not clear 
that a binary search is done.



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list