Live code analysis in DCT

[Joseph Rushton Wakeling]

On 24/05/12 14:25, Roman D. Boiko wrote:
> http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/performing-live-analysis-in-dct.html

Regarding another one of your posts (since I don't see a way to comment on your 
blog), you wrote

> Please note, that DCT license is Boost and I would like to keep this license
> for all code in this project. SDC uses MIT license. This means that code from
> SDC should not be used in DCT (unless the author of code releases it under the
> Boost license).

[from here: http://d-coding.com/2012/05/24/contributing-to-dct.html ]

Is there any real reason for such a decision, beyond aesthetics?  The whole 
point of permissive licences such as MIT and Boost is that you can incorporate 
that code into other projects without prejudicing the broader licence choice of 
the codebase.  Doesn't seem worth enforcing such a licensing constraint if the 
MIT-licensed code is useful.