Destructor nonsense on dlang.org

[Tove]

On Thursday, 24 May 2012 at 17:06:19 UTC, ponce wrote:
> I really had a hard time to believe it when #D told me so, but 
> there is no guaranteed order of destruction and as you cannot 
> relies on members still being alive in a class destructor.
> All of it can happen when making absolutely no cycles in the 
> object graph.
>
> What I do now is having a close function for each class which 
> hold a non-memory resource.
>
> This is writtent in TDPL, but I wish I was told earlier :)

http://dlang.org/class.html#destructors

"This rule does not apply to auto objects or objects deleted with 
the DeleteExpression, as the destructor is not being run by the 
garbage collector, meaning all references are valid."

i.e. non gc resources are fine... and it's also fine if you call 
clear()... it's only a problem if you rely on automatic 
collection and reference a object... so there's no need for 
close, as clear() will do the trick.