Pointer semantics in CTFE

Mehrdad wfunction at hotmail.com
Fri May 25 18:39:49 PDT 2012

On Friday, 25 May 2012 at 06:50:22 UTC, Don Clugston wrote:
> This is important for repeatability: if it was permitted, the 
> results would be arbitrary and might vary unpredictably with 
> subtle changes in the code, or change between compiler releases.

Wait, what?

Pointer semantics are well-defined... what's wrong with comparing 
two unrelated pointers?

More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list