D vs C++11

[1100110]

On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 11:08:16 -0500, H. S. Teoh <hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx>  
wrote:

> On Sat, Nov 03, 2012 at 09:02:58AM -0500, 1100110 wrote:
>> On Sat, 03 Nov 2012 07:46:17 -0500, Erèbe <erebe at erebe.eu> wrote:
> [...]
>> >Nearly no support in vim (my editor of choice), a Plugin for
>> >eclipse wich force you to stick with an older version, a Visual
>> >studio plugin where you need to buy a liscence in order to have
>> >the IDE. The only viable choice for me is the plugin for
>> >monodevelop which is really great but no debugger (assert is
>> >enough for now).
> [...]
>> Nearly no support in Vim?  Are you joking?  What does Vim not
>> support for D that you want it to?
> [...]
>
> Yeah I use vim too, and I don't see any problem. But then again, maybe
> he's looking for syntax highlighting or that kind of stuff which I don't
> use.
>
> But still. Oleg has a point -- IDE support and other such things need to
> be done by other people than the core developers, who need to focus on
> honing the language.
>
> I find it strange that every so often people clamor for IDE support,
> syntax highlighting, debugger support, etc., yet nobody seems to be
> willing to contribute actual code. Don't like something about the
> current state of D development tools? Well then do something about it.
> The source code is there for a reason, and it's not just to make people
> feel all warm and fuzzy inside because now we can label ourselves "open
> source".
>
>
> T
>

Check out D.Announce.  Even *more* support for D in vim.

I'm happy enough with my current setup, but I also want to play with this..
-- 
Wait.  Define 'within'.