dcollections

[deadalnix]

Le 06/11/2012 15:10, Joseph Rushton Wakeling a écrit :
> Hello all,
>
> Very naive question about dcollections 2.0 and std.container -- what are
> the reasons why dcollections has had to be developed as a standalone
> library, and what's in the way of incorporating that functionality into
> Phobos?
>

Allocator design.

> I have some potential use-cases where some of the not-in-Phobos stuff
> (e.g. sets) might be a good solution. It'd clearly be much nicer to be
> able to rely purely on the standard library instead of something
> outside. So, if there are some trivial things that can be done to get
> code transferred (e.g. if it's just a matter of time that people don't
> have), it'd be nice to know, in case I can do something to assist.
>

You are not alone. You have my full psychological support.