[ ArgumentList ] vs. @( ArgumentList )

Ali Çehreli acehreli at yahoo.com
Tue Nov 6 13:22:32 PST 2012


On 11/06/2012 01:19 PM, deadalnix wrote:
 > Le 06/11/2012 22:07, Tavi Cacina a écrit :
 >> On Tuesday, 6 November 2012 at 19:18:39 UTC, Walter Bright wrote:
 >>> No hitting below the belt! Let the games begin!
 >>
 >> @
 >>
 >>
 >
 > Who will make that even shorter ?

Not shorter but definitely more in line with C and C++ heritage:

     static() with optional ()

Ali



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list