[ ArgumentList ] vs. @( ArgumentList )

[deadalnix]

Le 06/11/2012 22:02, Jonathan M Davis a écrit :
> On Tuesday, November 06, 2012 11:18:34 Walter Bright wrote:
>> No hitting below the belt! Let the games begin!
>
> Definitely @(ArgumentList). It fits with what other languages do, and it matches
> what we're already doing for attributes. I also think that's what pretty much
> everyone was figuring would be used for user-defined attributes. The only major
> problem would be if @ArgumentList is allowed when there's only a single
> argument, then code could break when new built-in attributes are added.
>

Can you explain that code breakage ?