[RFC] Fix `object.destroy` problem

[Denis Shelomovskij]

08.11.2012 1:20, Denis Shelomovskij пишет:
> IMHO we have a huge design problem with `object.destroy`.
>
> Please, carefully read "Now the worst thing with `object.destroy`"
> section of the pull 344 about it:
> https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/344

Just my own post:
The first time I looked at `destroy` implementation (yes, I almost 
always read sources as documentation often gives a small part of needed 
information and in this particular case it really gives nothing) I 
considered it strange. From the second look when I completely understood 
what is it really doing I was in shock how such inconsistent and 
dangerous thing could ever be made. So finally I found time and did the 
pull. And it was obvious that everybody understand the problem or, if 
someone hasn't already read `destroy` implementation, he will see the 
diff and will agree in the moment.

But as it isn't the first time I think so, I provided a detailed 
description about [obvious] `destroy` problems. A response was about: 
"What is the problem with `destroy`? Why are you doing it?".

So here is this NG thread and, probably, I will hear even more "Why are 
you doing it?" questions which I don't know how to answer as I already 
listened all my reasons in pull description and can't add a lot. And 
probably will never understand why people asking such questions doesn't 
argue their opinion by proofing that my arguments are incorrect or 
irrelevant.

-- 
Денис В. Шеломовский
Denis V. Shelomovskij