precise gc?

eskimo jfanatiker at gmx.at
Sun Nov 11 01:13:35 PST 2012


> Yeah, you are right if all pointer bits are actually used it is far too
> easy. On the other hand especially because less space is wasted for
> pointers on 32 bit, I can easily afford an extra variable to solve this
> problem (kind of). 

I guess it is a pretty safe bet to assume that the lowest 65535
addresses in memory space (mask: 0x0000ffff) are not in GC memory?



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list