Growing a Language (applicable to @attribute design)

[Walter Bright]

On 11/13/2012 5:16 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> I would argue that we should strive to implement most new attributes
> into libraries.

I think that goes without saying, although it is a hard road to travel.

Consider, for example, the other thread where we are really trying hard to do 
"unique" as a library type rather than a builtin.


> I don't think we'll have much conflicts. Can you think of any future
> attributes that should be part of the language?

Well, we are guaranteed to think of some. But I don't anticipate it will be many.