Something needs to happen with shared, and soon.

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-11-14 22:06, Walter Bright wrote:

> I hate to repeat myself, but:
>
> Thread 1:
>      1. create shared object
>      2. pass reference to that object to Thread 2
>      3. destroy object
>
> Thread 2:
>      1. manipulate that object

Why would the object be destroyed if there's still a reference to it? If 
the object is manually destroyed I don't see what threads have to do 
with it since you can do the same thing in a single thread application.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg