A simple question

[Stugol]

On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 00:29:24 UTC, David Nadlinger 
wrote:
> On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 00:11:19 UTC, Stugol wrote:
>> Are these bugs likely to be addressed, or am I likely to be 
>> told to fuck off again?
>
> Ah, now things become clearer. The issue here is that what you 
> are describing is not an actual bug, but the consequence of you 
> not specifying one of the source files you imported as part of 
> the compiler command (use rdmd if you don't want to deal with 
> such things). Granted, the diagnostics for it are terrible, you 
> just get to see the raw linker error message.

No, this happens if I omit the optional MODULE statement at the 
top of the file as well. And, as I recall, at other times.

> In general, things such as this would be a great first problem 
> to attack for somebody interesting in compiler development.

How fascinating. Got anyone particular in mind?