A simple question

kenji hara k.hara.pg at gmail.com
Fri Nov 16 00:56:28 PST 2012


Now I'm working that.

Kenji Hara

2012/11/16 Don Clugston <dac at nospam.com>

> On 16/11/12 05:15, Rob T wrote:
>
>> On Friday, 16 November 2012 at 03:41:45 UTC, Stugol wrote:
>>
>>> Event_t e2;        // Will compile!
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yeah but that kinda blows, doesn't it?
>>>
>>>
>> I found it surprising or unintuitive that the !() is required, and I do
>> want to know what is the reasoning behind it,
>>
>
> One of the oldest open enhancement requests is on this topic:
>
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/**show_bug.cgi?id=1012<http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=1012>
>
> I don't what the reason is. It'd be interesting to revive the patch there,
> and see if it passes the compiler test suite.
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121116/8ac4ce4a/attachment.html>


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list