Something needs to happen with shared, and soon.

[foobar]

On Saturday, 17 November 2012 at 13:22:23 UTC, Michel Fortin 
wrote:
> On 2012-11-16 18:56:28 +0000, Dmitry Olshansky 
> <dmitry.olsh at gmail.com> said:
>
>> 11/16/2012 5:17 PM, Michel Fortin пишет:
>>> In case you want to protect two variables (or more) with the 
>>> same mutex.
>>> For instance:
>>> 
>>>     Mutex m;
>>>     synchronized(m) int next_id;
>>>     synchronized(m) Object[int] objects_by_id;
>>> 
>> 
>> Wrap in a struct and it would be even much clearer and safer.
>> struct ObjectRepository {
>> 	int next_id;
>> 	Object[int] objects_by_id;
>> }
>> //or whatever that combination indicates anyway
>> synchronized ObjectRepository objeRepo;
>
> I guess that'd be fine too.

<snip>

That solution does not work in the general case. More 
specifically any graph-like data structure. E.g a linked-lists, 
trees, etc..
Think for example an insert to a shared AVL tree.