@property needed or not needed?

Andrei Alexandrescu SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org
Mon Nov 19 07:01:38 PST 2012


On 11/19/12 8:18 AM, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
> On Monday, 19 November 2012 at 06:52:11 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>> We need to redesign it to such that the keyword '@property' is only
>> required in cases that otherwise would be ambiguous (functions
>> returning functions).
>
> There's a fairly easy way to do this, thanks to the @property word:
[snip]

Would you please start a DIP with a paste of this idea?

Andrei



More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list