@property needed or not needed?

[Michel Fortin]

On 2012-11-19 06:52:11 +0000, Andrei Alexandrescu 
<SeeWebsiteForEmail at erdani.org> said:

> On 11/19/12 1:02 AM, Rob T wrote:
>> So what's up with @property?
> 
> It's a mistake on top of another. We need to redesign it to such that 
> the keyword '@property' is only required in cases that otherwise would 
> be ambiguous (functions returning functions).

…or functions returning a type with an opCall.

What about template functions with a parametrized return type that will 
sometime be ambiguous and sometime not depending on the template 
parameters?

-- 
Michel Fortin
michel.fortin at michelf.ca
http://michelf.ca/