Is there interest in a std.http?

[Nicolas Sicard]

On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 03:49:57 UTC, Tyler Jameson 
Little wrote:
> Would a minor refactor of vibe.d be acceptable? This is pretty 
> much what I'm looking for:
>
> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/blob/master/source/vibe/http/common.d
> https://github.com/rejectedsoftware/vibe.d/blob/master/source/vibe/http/server.d
>
> Except that I'd remove some parts of it, like JSON parsing.
>
> I think that vibe.d could benefit from moving some of the code 
> there into Phobos. I guess it comes down to whether it makes 
> sense to make a standard HTTP library.

BTW, the actual JSON module in viba.data.json in richer in 
functionality and easier to use than the one in std.json. The 
module has virtually no dependency on other parts of vibe.d. I 
whish it was also moved to Phobos or at least inspired a 
refactoring of std.json.

Nicolas