@property needed or not needed?

[Timon Gehr]

On 11/20/2012 09:56 PM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 13:35:14 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
>> On Tuesday, 20 November 2012 at 06:06:21 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
>>> I'm not sure how it fit in the DIP but &funName is ambiguous when
>>> funName return a reference.
>>
>> We can just define this away: &funName if it isn't a @property is the
>> address of the function.
>>
>
> So this is impossible to get the address of the returned
> reference.
>

&funName()

>> If it is a @property, ALL operations work on the return value, so it
>> is rewritten as &(funName()).
>
> I agree that this is ho it should work.

+1.