externally imposed conditional compilation

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-11-27 08:22, Gor Gyolchanyan wrote:
> Nice idea, especially with the template to make things easier. Still it
> looks ugly. Version identifiers and numbers (as well as debug
> identifiers and numbers) serve a very good purpose (parametrizing
> modules), but they're vastly incomplete. There's so much useful stuff
> that could be done if module could have access to data of user defined
> types. I think this is very close to the idea of UDAs. If UDAs become
> mutable (which I think would be the most important feature of UDAs),
> then the module declaration could also get mutable UDAs, which would
> solve all problems. Don't you think? And version identifiers can be used
> as described in Version.d, except they'll change the module UDAs instead
> of defining a manifest constant.

Do you have any example of how you would like this to look like?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg