Breaking D2 language/spec changes with D1 being discontinued in a month

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Tue Nov 27 23:57:32 PST 2012


On 2012-11-28 02:38, SiegeLord wrote:
> Another DMD alpha, another set of previously valid code that no longer
> compiles. With 2.060 it was the TypeInfo constness changes in druntime,
> with 2.061 it is the dissalowance of rebindability of the this pointer.
> The latter did make it into the spec half a year ago, but recently it
> was actually dissallowed in the beta. Unlike many other features of the
> sort (e.g. octal literals) there is no warning or deprecation errors...
> code that use to compile simply does not anymore.
>
> In this last case, in principle, we were lucky... the spec was changed.
> What about things like this: http://dlang.org/attribute.html#inout . Are
> those undocumented features liable to change at any time? What warning
> will there be when somebody decides to submit an inout bug and somebody
> else fixes it in a way that breaks existing code?
>
> D1 is scheduled to be discontinued in a month, and every new version of
> DMD keeps changing D2 in code breaking ways (or worse, with backwards
> incompatible spec changes). I think that unless people responsible for
> these things get their act together and stabilize D2 against these
> issues, D1 support should be extended until that happens.

Welcome do D.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list