Help!

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-11-28 13:43, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:

> Totally agreed. One issue now is that Walter has converged briskly on
> the simplistic conclusion "no more steenking breakages" instead of
> learning git and designing a useful process around it. That way the
> process remains broken instead of being identified as the main issue and
> fixed. I have advocated privately in much stronger terms than I could
> afford publicly that we must fix the process and exercise good judgment
> about changing the language - all to no avail. "No more breakages" is
> like taking an aspirin for the fever caused by gangrene.
>
> I think with dread about what's coming when completing shared will be on
> the table. We'll be looking at not breaking code that was by definition
> broken.

Thanks again for acknowledging these problems. I do really hope what we 
can see some changes in this area.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg