Help!

[deadalnix]

On Wednesday, 28 November 2012 at 17:19:48 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
> On 11/28/2012 07:31 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>> On 2012-11-28 13:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>
>>> Yep. Rails 4 breaks Rails 3 code. Not Rails 3.061 breaks 
>>> Rails 3.060
>>> code :o).
>>
>> I've talked about that before. D doesn't have a versioning 
>> scheme that
>> makes any sense. It's just a number that gets incremented 
>> without any
>> meaning. Except that a greater number indicates a later 
>> version. Also
>> changes to the language, compiler, runtime and standard 
>> library always
>> happen in the same release.
>>
>
> I must admit that I'm surprised that no one has simply forked 
> the project in order to apply their own versioning scheme to it.

Well, D has been forked in the past (tango vs phobos) but it 
tended to make things even worse.