Help!

[1100110]

On 11/28/2012 11:49 AM, deadalnix wrote:
> On Wednesday, 28 November 2012 at 17:19:48 UTC, 1100110 wrote:
>> On 11/28/2012 07:31 AM, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
>>> On 2012-11-28 13:46, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
>>>
>>>> Yep. Rails 4 breaks Rails 3 code. Not Rails 3.061 breaks Rails 3.060
>>>> code :o).
>>>
>>> I've talked about that before. D doesn't have a versioning scheme that
>>> makes any sense. It's just a number that gets incremented without any
>>> meaning. Except that a greater number indicates a later version. Also
>>> changes to the language, compiler, runtime and standard library always
>>> happen in the same release.
>>>
>>
>> I must admit that I'm surprised that no one has simply forked the
>> project in order to apply their own versioning scheme to it.
>
> Well, D has been forked in the past (tango vs phobos) but it tended to
> make things even worse.

Well I was thinking more along the lines of prevent breaking changes but 
I suppose you are right.

And now that you mention it, I suppose I've forked the GC as well...