Breaking D2 language/spec changes with D1 being discontinued in a month

[Manu]

On 29 November 2012 11:52, Danni Coy <danni.coy at gmail.com> wrote:

> Holy crap I had no idea that this conference even existed. It turns out I
> am in melbourne for the next few days for entirely different reasons. Manu
> thinks I should buy you a drink (i concur)...
>

Yes, and make sure to remind him that it's all your fault! ;)


I am generally in favour of the language being good rather than being
> stable at this point in time. This is general keeping with the philosophy
> that the right way do do things should be the easiest way to do things.
>
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 29, 2012 at 8:37 AM, Walter Bright <newshound2 at digitalmars.com
> > wrote:
>
>> On 11/29/2012 3:31 AM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
>>
>>> Well, then we're about to reach the point when it's ripe to do that,
>>> because
>>> D1 is about to no longer be supported. With the beta for 2.061 (whenever
>>> that
>>> happens), we can adjust how we do the beta process to properly use
>>> branches,
>>> and then we can adjust how we deal with stable and development branches
>>> of D2
>>> for future releases.
>>>
>>
>> My thoughts, too.
>>
>> BTW, just so everyone knows, I am currently in Melbourne at the YOW
>> conference. It's the start of a 3 city tour, so I won't get home until Dec.
>> 8. The hotel internet connection is not much more suitable than for email
>> and newsgroups, and my travel laptop is not well suited for dev, so aside
>> from my conference obligations I intend to be doing things like D articles,
>> learning new stuff, and other back-and-fill work until then.
>>
>> BTW, it's a great conference. There are a lot of freakin' smart people
>> here, which always makes things a joy.
>>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121129/d5932499/attachment.html>