D Stable Proposal

[deadalnix]

On Friday, 30 November 2012 at 15:08:24 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu 
wrote:
> On 11/30/12 4:49 AM, 1100110 wrote:
>> Andrei's support is also necessary, IIRC he is one of main 
>> person behind
>> phobos. A stable version of D is not useful without a stable 
>> version of
>> phobos and druntime to go with it.
>
> I'm very supportive of a serious, meaningful initiative.
>
> My perception is that we're having growing pains - our process 
> is lagging behind the participation in the project and the 
> attention it receives. If Walter and I do not acknowledge that 
> in time and act swiftly on it, we're heading toward a crisis in 
> the community much, much larger and dangerous than the D1/D2 
> schism.
>

The thing is that I don't see that succeed as an external project.

This is like we wanted both vegetarian and non vegetarian food, 
and reached that goal by cooking everything all together and then 
some people spent their time to separate the meat from the rest.

Most likely they'll get bored rapidly as it is a lot of boring 
work, that is useless if the process don't mix everything in the 
first place.