A study on immutability usage

[Russel Winder]

On Thu, 2012-10-04 at 03:49 +0200, Jesse Phillips wrote:
[…]
> So, you are saying that these examples are exhibiting the same 
> problems because they are based on the same design?
> 
> I don't see how that would invalidate the results. That is, I 
> don't see the relevance here.

My comment relates to Jeff's point that what you find is determined by
what you are looking for.  Also that what people write is determined by
what they have been told is good and so the use of GoF patterns is what
will be found now as then. No commentary was intended on any previous
posts in the thread.

-- 
Russel.
=============================================================================
Dr Russel Winder      t: +44 20 7585 2200   voip: sip:russel.winder at ekiga.net
41 Buckmaster Road    m: +44 7770 465 077   xmpp: russel at winder.org.uk
London SW11 1EN, UK   w: www.russel.org.uk  skype: russel_winder
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://lists.puremagic.com/pipermail/digitalmars-d/attachments/20121004/ef6fd5f8/attachment.pgp>