The sorry state of the D stack?

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Sunday, October 07, 2012 11:43:21 Peter Alexander wrote:
> On Saturday, 6 October 2012 at 21:19:58 UTC, Joseph Rushton
> 
> Wakeling wrote:
> > On 10/06/2012 10:59 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> >> Definitely not. *DSource* is dying, unfortunately, which has
> >> lead some
> >> people to assume the same of the rest of D. But no, D is going
> >> very
> >> strong, and has only been getting bigger.
> > 
> > Might be worth placing some prominent message on DSource
> > stating that it's being maintained to document all the D1 work
> > and projects, but that the active work is now over at dlang.org?
> 
> +1
> 
> Getting tired of people heading to dsource and assuming that D is
> dead.

Isn't part of the problem that no one can get ahold of the person who runs it? 
At least, that's what I remember being discussed previously. It was my 
understanding that that's why we've never been able to get dsource cleaned up 
or really changed at all.

- Jonathan M Davis