#pragma comment (lib, ...)

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Thu Oct 11 11:58:06 PDT 2012


On 2012-10-11 14:36, Walter Bright wrote:

> Are you saying that just to support pragma(lib), we should write a new
> linker?

No, not just because this feature alone. There are many other features 
that could be implemented with a smarter linker. There has been talk 
about this on the newsgroups several times. Better handling templates 
and overloaded functions, for example.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list