#pragma comment (lib, ...)
Jacob Carlborg
doob at me.com
Thu Oct 11 11:58:06 PDT 2012
On 2012-10-11 14:36, Walter Bright wrote:
> Are you saying that just to support pragma(lib), we should write a new
> linker?
No, not just because this feature alone. There are many other features
that could be implemented with a smarter linker. There has been talk
about this on the newsgroups several times. Better handling templates
and overloaded functions, for example.
--
/Jacob Carlborg
More information about the Digitalmars-d
mailing list