private is non-virtual: Stuck in C++-thinking?

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Sat, 20 Oct 2012 00:18:28 +0200
"foobar" <foo at bar.com> wrote:
> 
> virtual private is an obscure C++ idiom which I think the 
> argument for is extremely week.


Well like I said though, virtual private is *very* different in C++
than it is in D, because private itself is very different in C++ than
in D.

> I think Walter made the right 
> decision here in favor of more readable code.
>