New std.process?

Alex Rønne Petersen alex at lycus.org
Mon Oct 22 05:38:20 PDT 2012


On 22-10-2012 07:46, Graham St Jack wrote:
> On Sun, 21 Oct 2012 21:36:32 +0400, Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
>
>> 21.10.2012 1:52, David Nadlinger пишет:
>>> On Saturday, 20 October 2012 at 18:56:01 UTC, Alex Rønne Petersen
>>> wrote:
>>> Oh, and could somebody please post a link to the latest version of the
>>> new std.process draft? I will probably add cross-platform support for
>>> constraining execution time and resource (RAM, mostly) usage, but there
>>> is no point in reimplementing it if it's already there.
>>>
>>> David
>>
>> Probably original discussion with links:
>> http://www.digitalmars.com/d/archives/digitalmars/D/
> The_new_std.process_163694.html
>>
>> Links from that thread:
>> * std.process overhaul:
>> https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/commits/new-std-process * druntime
>> changes:
>> https://github.com/schveiguy/druntime/commits/new-std-process
>>
>
> I am also hanging out for the new std.process. Any idea when the required
> druntime changes will go in, or if they have already?
>

I suspect they're probably some trivial POSIX/Windows API declarations, 
so reviewing and merging them shouldn't be a bottleneck, but somebody 
has to actually submit the changes as a pull request.

-- 
Alex Rønne Petersen
alex at lycus.org
http://lycus.org


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list