On D development

[Robert Klotzner]

> At this point in D's evolution I very strongly think it's the time to 
> put to good use its many features, instead of making it any easier to 
> add more. Constraints are liberating. Innovation can be found in the 
> minds of people, and the thought that there's always a new feature that 
> can be added instead of an innovative solution within the existing 
> language stifles creativity.

I completely agree, D's feature set is already very good and well
thought of. But having more thorough testing, might still be a good
idea. In fact I am very happy with D's feature set, but as long as D is
alive there will be improvements from time to time and having a way of
testing them thoroughly, can't really harm the language. But I don't
know. You and other people more involved in development are of course
better judges of usefulness of this proposal. Basically I was just
curious why it is not done this way.