D and SCons

[Chris Holdsworth]

On 04/09/2012 17:01, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 04, 2012 at 09:06:56AM +0100, Russel Winder wrote:
> [...]
>> What is comes down to is whether people testing the evolution of D
>> tooling would be happy to work with a fork of SCons or whether it is
>> necessary to work with a separate package and a distributed SCons.
> [...]
>
> I'm OK to use a fork of SCons as long as it doesn't disrupt my non-D
> projects.
>
>
> T
>
+1. I'm happy to accept a reasonable amount of pain to help the 
evolution of D+Scons.