int[][] better type match than int[] for int[]?!

Steven Schveighoffer schveiguy at yahoo.com
Mon Sep 17 06:25:51 PDT 2012


On Mon, 17 Sep 2012 09:21:41 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic  
<andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> wrote:

> This completely surprised me:
>
> bool doMatch(int[] lhsArr, int[][] arrArr)
> {
>     foreach (int[] rhsArr; arrArr)
>     {
>         writeln("if (!doMatch(lhsArr, arrArr))");
>
>         if (!.doMatch(lhsArr, arrArr))

Don't you mean:

if(!.doMatch(lhsArr, rhsArr))

??

>             return false;
>     }
>
>     return true;
> }
>
> bool doMatch(int[] lhsArr, int[] rhsArr)
> {
>     return true;
> }
>
> void main()
> {
>     int[] x   = [1, 2];
>     int[][] y = [[1, 2], [1, 2]];
>
>     bool b = doMatch(x, y);
> }
>
> This will enter an infinite loop because the first doMatch overload
> gets recursively called. I don't understand why the second overload
> isn't picked up as a match in the call "doMatch(lhsArr, arrArr)".

Because arrArr is an int[][] :)

-Steve


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list