SpanMode uses incorrect terminology (breadth)

Mehrdad wfunction at hotmail.com
Tue Sep 18 07:38:48 PDT 2012


On Tuesday, 18 September 2012 at 14:24:30 UTC, David Piepgrass 
wrote:
>> Breadth-first (probably never required):
>> a/b
>> a/c
>> a/1.txt
>> a/2.txt
>> a/b/1.txt
>> a/b/2.txt
>> a/c/z
>> a/c/1.txt
>> a/c/z/1.txt
>> Defining property: number of /'s increases monotonically. Note 
>> how the deeper you go, the more spread out the children 
>> become. It's ALL children, then ALL grandchildren, then ALL 
>> great-grandchildren, etc.
>>
>> I wouldn't bother implementing breadth-first. It's doubtful 
>> that anyone would want it, surely...?
>
> Actually I prefer breadth-first search when searching the file 
> system. When I search an entire volume, inevitably the 
> (depth-first) search gets stuck in a few giant, deep 
> directories like the source code of Mono or some other cave of 
> source code, you know, something 12 directories deep with 
> 100,000 files in it. A breadth-first search would be more 
> likely to find the thing I'm looking for BEFORE going 
> spelunking in these 12-deep caves.

We really need iterative deepening.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list