Extending unittests [proposal] [Proof Of Concept]

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Fri Sep 21 11:36:04 PDT 2012


On 2012-09-21 20:01, Johannes Pfau wrote:

> I didn't think of setAssertHandler. My changes are perfectly compatible
> with it.
> IIRC setAssertHandler has the small downside that it's used for all
> asserts, not only those used in unit tests? I'm not sure if that's a
> drawback or actually useful.

That's no problem, there's a predefined version, "unittest", when you 
pass the -unittest flag to the compiler:

version (unittest)
     setAssertHandler(myUnitTestSpecificAssertHandler);

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list