Review of Andrei's std.benchmark

[David Piepgrass]

>> Some random comments about std.benchmark based on its 
>> documentation:
>>
>> - It is very strange that the documentation of printBenchmarks 
>> uses neither of the words "average" or "minimum", and doesn't 
>> say how many trials are done....
>
> Because all of those are irrelevant and confusing.

Huh? It's not nearly as confusing as reading the documentation 
and not having the faintest idea what it will do. The way the 
benchmarker works is somehow 'irrelevant'? The documentation 
doesn't even indicate that the functions are to be run more than 
once!!

> I don't think that's a good idea.

I have never seen you make such vague arguments, Andrei.