Extending unittests [proposal] [Proof Of Concept]

[Jens Mueller]

Jacob Carlborg wrote:
> On 2012-09-22 19:43, Jens Mueller wrote:
> 
> >What does it mean to make no distinction in RSpec?
> >Both should be reported. In D you just see either an AssertError or
> >SomeException.
> 
> Test-unit would report something like this:
> 
> 5 tests, 2 failures, 1 error
> 
> Failures would be asserts that triggered, errors would be thrown exceptions.
> 
> Rspec on the other hand would report:
> 
> 5 examples, 3 failures
> 
> It doesn't care if a failure is due to a thrown exception or a
> failed assert.

I see. Thanks for giving this example.

> Both of these also show a form of stack trace if an exception has
> been thrown.

How is the stack trace provided? Do you get a stack trace for each
failure/error? Because that may clutter up the output. Maybe they stop
at a predefined stack trace length.

Jens