DIP19: Remove comma operator from D and provision better syntactic support for tuples

[jerro]

On Sunday, 23 September 2012 at 22:29:31 UTC, jerro wrote:
> On Sunday, 23 September 2012 at 21:37:06 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe 
> wrote:
>> I'm not for removing the comma operator, but it occurs to me 
>> we could do it in the library:
>>
>> auto commaOperatorReplacement(T...)(T t) {
>>   return t[$-1];
>> }
>>
>> There might be some edge case where that wouldn't work, but I 
>> think it works in most cases.
>
> If D is like C in this regard, then the function above cannot 
> replace comma operator, because the order of evaluation is 
> defined for comma operator, but not for function parameters. 
> You could use something like that, though:

Sorry about the "You could use something like that, though" part. 
I realized "something like that" wouldn't work either, but forgot 
to delete that text.