DIP19: Remove comma operator from D and provision better syntactic support for tuples

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-09-24 07:01, Nick Sabalausky wrote:

> I think one of us is missing something, and I'm not entirely sure
> who.
>
> As I explained (perhaps poorly), the zero- and one-element tuples *would
> still be* tuples. They would just be implicitly convertible to
> non-tuple form *if* needed, and vice versa. Do you see a reason why
> that would *necessarily* not be the case?

Would that mean you could start doing things like:

int a = 3;
int b = a[0];

That feels very weird.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg