DIP19: Remove comma operator from D and provision better syntactic support for tuples

[Jacob Carlborg]

On 2012-09-24 12:06, Nick Sabalausky wrote:

> No, because there's nothing typed (int) involved there. But you could do
> this:
>
>      int a = 3;
>      (int) b = a;
>      a = b;

But you said:

"They would just be implicitly convertible
to non-tuple form *if* needed, and vice versa."

To me that sounds like a tuple of one element of the type int would be 
implicitly convertible to an int. And, an int would be implicitly 
convertible to a tuple of one element.

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg