DIP19: Remove comma operator from D and provision better syntactic support for tuples

[Jonathan M Davis]

On Tuesday, September 25, 2012 12:28:15 Michel Fortin wrote:
> Although to make things less confusing, I think the built-in language
> tuple should give up its name. It could become a "sequence". Renaming
> the built-in one would certainly be less trouble, as code doesn't refer
> to it by its name, and you can pick a name that fits better with its
> auto-expanding behaviour.

Not referred to by its name? It's refereed to as TypeTuple all over the place. 
It's arguably a bad name, but it would break a _lot_ of code to change it now.

- Jonathan M Davis