Rust and D

[Nick Sabalausky]

On Sat, 29 Sep 2012 13:06:33 +0200
"Peter Alexander" <peter.alexander.au at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> The answer to that question is obvious: you should bother going 
> without because other languages provide other things that your 
> pet language does not (e.g. channels + simplicity in this case).
> 
> Searching for a better language is a search like any other. 
> Hill-climbing is a poor search heuristic. Sometimes you have to 
> be willing to lose features to find the higher peaks.
> 

And sometimes I need to get work done instead of trying out all of the
100's of languages out there in some altruistic quest to be fair to
everybody.