Formal Review of std.process

H. S. Teoh hsteoh at quickfur.ath.cx
Thu Apr 4 10:23:01 PDT 2013


On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 01:04:52PM -0400, Steven Schveighoffer wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:50:01 -0400, Andrej Mitrovic
> <andrej.mitrovich at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> >On 4/4/13, Jesse Phillips <Jesse.K.Phillips+D at gmail.com> wrote:
> >>Source:
> >>https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-process2/std/process2.d
> >
> >Dead link.
> 
> https://github.com/kyllingstad/phobos/blob/std-process2/std/process.d
> 
> At the last minute I insisted we change std.process2 to std.process
> since it was agreed to incorporate the original API instead of
> redesigning it slightly.
[...]

Hooray! Looking forward to *not* having "std.process2". Didn't like that
name from the start. I'll take a closer look at the code/docs later, for
the review.


T

-- 
Государство делает вид, что платит нам зарплату, а мы делаем вид, что работаем.


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list