My thoughts & tries with rvalue references

[Dicebot]

On Thursday, 4 April 2013 at 16:25:52 UTC, kenji hara wrote:
> I also think writing DIP would be better.
> ...

Btw, Kenji, what do you think about redefining "in" to "const 
scope ref" and allowing compiler to chose how variable exactly is 
passed ("auto ref" with no template bloat)? Within those 
restrictions plain values should be indistinguishable from const 
rvalue refs.

Will make "in" also much more meaningful as a separate entity.