DIP32: Uniform tuple syntax

[Zach the Mystic]

On Friday, 5 April 2013 at 23:49:49 UTC, bearophile wrote:
> timotheecour:
>
>> What about
>> ----
>> {c, void} = tup;
>
> I think the question mark is better here. It's shorter and it 
> has only one meaning.
>
> Bye,
> bearophile

Not disagreeing, but you had mentioned nullable types before, and 
I was wondering what they might look like also. Have you made an 
enhancement for these I could examine?