Formal Review of std.process

Jacob Carlborg doob at me.com
Sun Apr 7 23:48:42 PDT 2013


On 2013-04-04 16:22, Jesse Phillips wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have decided to take on Review Manager for std.process and hopefully
> will keep it up and get through the review queue. This is slightly
> ignoring a "first come, first serve" approach, but that is mostly
> because I didn't want to look into it. (So don't be too upset).
>
> std.process has been under review for some time having discussion on the
> pull request and this thread:
> http://forum.dlang.org/thread/stxxtfwfrwllkcpunhue@forum.dlang.org
>
> I would like to propose the Formal review is one week (and one week
> voting). If there is objection speak up.

Why does all functions taking stdin/stdout/stderr append an underscore 
to these parameter names?

-- 
/Jacob Carlborg


More information about the Digitalmars-d mailing list